How should added words in a proposed amendment be formatted?

In the context of formatting proposed amendments, using underlined text to indicate added words is a widely accepted practice. This method clearly differentiates the newly proposed language from the existing text, making it easy for those reviewing the amendment to spot changes at a glance. The visual distinction is effective, as underline formatting typically signifies something that is new or modified in legal and formal documents.

Other formatting options like bolding, highlighting, and italicizing serve different purposes. For instance, bold text is commonly used for emphasis rather than indicating additions, while highlighting is often reserved for marking critical sections but can be less professional in formal documents and may not convey clarity about the specific changes made. Italics are usually utilized for titles, emphasis, or references, rather than for denoting new additions to text. Therefore, underlining is the most precise choice for indicating added words in a proposed amendment.