What is true regarding the manner in which proposed amendments to governing documents must be presented?

The correct option highlights that it is not necessary for all changes to be in bold print when presenting proposed amendments to governing documents. This reflects a flexibility in how amendments can be communicated, acknowledging that while highlighting changes can enhance clarity, there is no strict requirement for every modification to be presented in bold.

The goal of presenting proposed amendments is to ensure that all members understand the changes being made, so the emphasis can be placed on clarity and comprehension rather than on a specific formatting style. Additionally, different organizations may have specific rules or practices regarding document amendments, which could include options other than bold print for emphasizing changes, such as summaries or other forms of highlighting.

Other approaches, such as only highlighting significant changes or providing summaries of changes alone, may not fully meet the requirement for transparency and thoroughness in communication that governing documents typically seek. Therefore, the understanding that not all changes must be in bold print offers a more adaptable and practical approach to the amendment process.